Quantcast

image

Why do people publicly admit to reading Robert Greene's books? That's like saying "Hi, I’m manipulative and power-hungry. Want to work together?"

Several times I have googled people who publicly admit (e.g. on a blog) that they like one or more of Robert Greene’s books. So obviously my first thought is Don’t Trust This Person. Haven’t been wrong about that yet. And let me just add: all such people have been Republicans. I’m not going to say anything, but I’ll just leave this here…

image

I'm just saying ... the guy shot his friend in the face, campaigned against the marriage rights of his daughter, and sent cushy government contracts the way of his oil company.

It just seems obvious that the first rule of manipulating people has to be that they can’t know they’re being manipulated. Even if a tyrant wanted to rule with an iron fist (yang ), peasants will flee if they know in advance that someone’s going to subjugate them. And there is an obvious facsimile to business.

Machiavellian

image

Niccolò Machiavelli is (wrongly) pegged as the progenitor of the manipulative, skulky, suspicious, power-grabbing style of leadership … let’s call it the Skeletor School of Management. But no one trusts Skeletor. And no one would really follow Skeletor. A consummate Machiavellian would never be so dumb as to let on that he’s about to manipulate you. I don’t even think Skeletor was that dumb … and he’s regularly outwitted by a monosyllabic barbarian with a claymore.

image

Anyway … why do people admit to reading Robert Greene?

14 notes

  1. gaszookie reblogged this from isomorphismes and added:
    Click for the full post from mathematical-poetics.
  2. missymisanthrope reblogged this from isomorphismes
  3. cultofsalvaje reblogged this from isomorphismes
  4. galibels reblogged this from isomorphismes
  5. isomorphismes posted this