Quantcast

Astute reader wargut responded to yesterday’s observation about the Fahrenheit scale being affine-ish with the following incorrect assertion:

Seriously, guys, your system is bullsh~t.

It’s on.

First, the Kelvin scale is indisputably the best of {K,℉,℃} for physics. Given that ∃ a natural zero it should be reflected in the measurement system.

American exceptionalism

But Fahrenheit is the best scale for everyday use. We are not in the science lab, so all of Centigrade’s properties that are nice in chemistry class don’t matter.

Celsians brag that 0 ℃ and 100 ℃ make it easy to remember where water boils and freezes. So what? Fahrenheit makes it easy to remember the temperature of the human body and icy seawater. Or roughly the hottest day and the coldest day.

image

Outdoor temperatures in Indiana range from −17 ℃ on the coldest day of winter to 39 ℃ on the hottest day of summer. During the seasons I would be outdoors for more than the necessary minimum—March to November—the daily highs are between 7℃ and 29 ℃.

So most of the relevant temperature variation — the vast differences throughout all of spring, summer, and fall—are restricted to only 23 integers. (I could use decimals, if I wanted to sound like a robot.)

image

When I lived in ℃ places I had to pay attention to single-digit differences like 24 ℃ versus 29 ℃, wasting the first digit.

Celsius is a scale for science, not for humans.

In Fahrenheit I get the basic idea with the first digit.

  • "It’s in the thirties" = multiple layers and coat.
  • "It’s in the nineties" = T shirt weather.

In the 70’s and 80’s I want a second sig-fig but I don’t even need 10 elements of precision. Just “upper 70’s” is enough. The first ℉ digit gives you ballpark, and the second ℉ digit gives you even more precision than you need.

image

In a sentence: Fahrenheit uses its digits more efficiently than Centigrade. Centigrade adopts the decimal convention but then throws away 70% of the range. Fahrenheit’s gradations are so well tuned that it only requires {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} × {low, medium, high}, for a cognitive savings of 7 unneeded numbers in each of 9 decades.

Celsius may be better for chemistry. Fahrenheit is better for real life.

140 notes

  1. inkbomber reblogged this from clrunklock
  2. robinoflocksly reblogged this from clrunklock
  3. lotrfrk18 reblogged this from sherlollysmooch and added:
    So… YEAH.
  4. stasi-221btardis reblogged this from sherlollysmooch
  5. clrunklock reblogged this from sherlollysmooch and added:
    Okay but what about negative temperatures? In Celsius, when someone says “minus whatever” it’s easy to understand that...
  6. mercuryandmadhatters reblogged this from sherlollysmooch
  7. 221b--benedict reblogged this from sherlollysmooch
  8. sherlollysmooch reblogged this from isomorphismes
  9. goodnewspenguins reblogged this from isomorphismes and added:
    YES.
  10. chiffer0be reblogged this from isomorphismes
  11. project-annihilation reblogged this from hellomynameismaddy
  12. hellomynameismaddy reblogged this from isomorphismes
  13. ilovememesandlordoftherings reblogged this from isomorphismes and added:
    This. Someone else also put it this way: You can tell the difference between a few degrees in Fahrenheit, yet in Celsius...
  14. faithnarmore reblogged this from isomorphismes
  15. -beastm0de reblogged this from bathtime
  16. sixlittleindians reblogged this from bathtime
  17. pirriwinkles reblogged this from bathtime
  18. bathtime reblogged this from isomorphismes
  19. donghaesi reblogged this from isomorphismes
  20. rafflesiaflowersforalgernon reblogged this from wetwasteofagirl
  21. chubbznj reblogged this from wetwasteofagirl
  22. wetwasteofagirl reblogged this from crossingwinter
  23. crossingwinter reblogged this from justanothercalamity
  24. justanothercalamity reblogged this from isomorphismes