Why Fahrenheit is Better than Celsius

Astute reader wargut responded to yesterday’s observation about the Fahrenheit scale being affine-ish with the following incorrect assertion:

Seriously, guys, your system is bullsh~t.

It’s on.

First, the Kelvin scale is indisputably the best of {K,℉,℃} for physics. Given that ∃ a natural zero it should be reflected in the measurement system.

But Fahrenheit is the best scale for everyday use. We are not in the science lab, so all of Centigrade’s properties that are nice in chemistry class don’t matter.

Celsians brag that 0 ℃ and 100 ℃ make it easy to remember where water boils and freezes. So what? Fahrenheit makes it easy to remember the temperature of the human body and icy seawater. Or roughly the hottest day and the coldest day.

Outdoor temperatures in Indiana range from −17 ℃ on the coldest day of winter to 39 ℃ on the hottest day of summer. During the seasons I would be outdoors for more than the necessary minimum—March to November—the daily highs are between 7℃ and 29 ℃.

So most of the relevant temperature variation — the vast differences throughout all of spring, summer, and fall—are restricted to only 23 integers. (I could use decimals, if I wanted to sound like a robot.)

When I lived in ℃ places I had to pay attention to single-digit differences like 24 ℃ versus 29 ℃, wasting the first digit.

In Fahrenheit I get the basic idea with the first digit.

• "It’s in the thirties" = multiple layers and coat.
• "It’s in the nineties" = T shirt weather.

In the 70’s and 80’s I want a second sig-fig but I don’t even need 10 elements of precision. Just “upper 70’s” is enough. The first ℉ digit gives you ballpark, and the second ℉ digit gives you even more precision than you need.

In a sentence: Fahrenheit uses its digits more efficiently than Centigrade. Centigrade adopts the decimal convention but then throws away 70% of the range. Fahrenheit’s gradations are so well tuned that it only requires {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} × {low, medium, high}, for a cognitive savings of 7 unneeded numbers in each of 9 decades.

Celsius may be better for chemistry. Fahrenheit is better for real life.

289 notes

1. amazingsomthing reblogged this from doonarose
2. impromptuonedykedanceparty reblogged this from gaypocalypse
3. nivellaq87 reblogged this from mumfordandhyungs
4. shouganairu reblogged this from boldlaughter
5. melonny reblogged this from dwac
6. terraslip reblogged this from mumfordandhyungs
7. dwac reblogged this from boldlaughter
8. boldlaughter reblogged this from pereqrintook
9. pereqrintook reblogged this from wordplaying
10. mumfordandhyungs reblogged this from gaypocalypse
11. caelarue reblogged this from partysoft
12. drbrucebananer reblogged this from partysoft
13. selfprofessedmathnerd reblogged this from mathematicallyspeaking and added:
HAHA so in California I will yield but in negative land up here we need our Celcius!
14. mathematicallyspeaking reblogged this from selfprofessedmathnerd and added:
For those of us in California, where we don’t even get in negatives, Celsius is useless IMO. Seriously, the lowest it...
15. carrotcupcake reblogged this from thenkeepgoing
16. oricakecakecake reblogged this from lostquaintrelle
17. rdub549 reblogged this from hipppocrite
18. hipppocrite reblogged this from stubblesmcgee
19. stubblesmcgee reblogged this from desidere and added:
Yeah Celsius for life in the lab, but Fahrenheit is dope as shit for dressing for the weather.
20. ossianistic reblogged this from violentlypurple and added:
what the fuck? idk i mean once you actually live somewhere where the weather gives you the temp in celsius and then you...
21. violentlypurple reblogged this from raisedbyhyenas and added:
as a canadian, you all need jesus
22. that-other-lesbian-ellen reblogged this from gaypocalypse
23. counterfeit-toast reblogged this from raisedbyhyenas and added:
I wonder if people up at the far end of the Dalton Highway have this discussion when they’re stranded up there during...
24. raisedbyhyenas reblogged this from partysoft